mvs
Methods for high-dimensional multi-view learning based on the
multi-view stacking (MVS) framework. Data have a multi-view structure
when features comprise different ‘views’ of the same observations. For
example, the different views may comprise omics, imaging or electronic
health records. Package mvs
provides functions to fit
stacked penalized logistic regression (StaPLR) models, which are a
special case of multi-view stacking (MVS). Additionally,
mvs
generalizes the StaPLR model to settings with a
Gaussian or Poisson outcome distribution, and to hierarchical multi-view
structures with more than two levels. For more information about the
StaPLR and MVS methods, see Van Loon, Fokkema, Szabo, & De Rooij
(2020) and Van Loon et al. (2022).
The current stable release can be installed directly from CRAN:
::install.packages("mvs") utils
The current development version can be installed from GitLab using
package devtools
:
::install_gitlab("wsvanloon/mvs@develop") devtools
mvs
The two main functions are StaPLR()
(alias
staplr
), which fits penalized and stacked penalized
regression models models with up to two levels, and MVS()
(alias mvs
), which fits multi-view stacking models with
>= 2 levels. Objects returned by either function have associated
coef
and predict
methods.
StaPLR
library("mvs")
Generate 1000 observations with four two-feature views with varying within- and between-view correlation:
set.seed(012)
<- 1000
n <- seq(0.1, 0.7, 0.1)
cors <- matrix(NA, nrow=n, ncol=length(cors)+1)
X 1] <- rnorm(n)
X[ , for (i in 1:length(cors)) {
+1] <- X[ , 1]*cors[i] + rnorm(n, 0, sqrt(1-cors[i]^2))
X[ , i
}<- c(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
beta <- X %*% beta
eta <- exp(eta)/(1+exp(eta))
p <- rbinom(n, 1, p) y
Fit StaPLR:
<- rep(1:(ncol(X)/2), each=2)
view_index set.seed(012)
<- StaPLR(X, y, view_index) fit
Extract coefficients at the view level:
<- coef(fit)
coefs $meta coefs
## 5 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -2.345398
## V1 4.693861
## V2 .
## V3 .
## V4 .
We see that the only the first view has been selected. The data was
generated so that only the first feature (from the first view) was a
true predictor, but it was also substantially correlated with features
from other views (see cor(X)
), most strongly with the
features from the fourth view.
Extract coefficients at the base level:
$base coefs
## [[1]]
## 3 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -0.05351035
## V1 0.86273113
## V2 0.09756006
##
## [[2]]
## 3 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -6.402186e-02
## V1 1.114585e-38
## V2 1.156060e-38
##
## [[3]]
## 3 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -0.06875322
## V1 0.26176566
## V2 0.35602028
##
## [[4]]
## 3 x 1 sparse Matrix of class "dgCMatrix"
## s1
## (Intercept) -0.03101978
## V1 0.27605205
## V2 0.39234018
We see that the first feature has the strongest effect on the predicted outcome, with a base-level regression coefficient of 0.86. The features in views two, three and four all have zero effect, since the meta-level coefficients for these views are zero.
Compute predictions:
<- matrix(rnorm(16), nrow=2)
new_X predict(fit, new_X)
## lambda.min
## [1,] 0.8698197
## [2,] 0.1819153
By default, the predictions are made using the values of the penalty parameters which minimize the cross-validation error (lambda.min).
As StaPLR was developed in the context of binary classification
problems, the default outcome distribution is
family = "binomial"
. Other outcome distributions (e.g.,
Gaussian, Poisson) can be modeled by specifying, e.g.,
family = "gaussian"
or
family = "poisson"
.
A generalization of stacked penalized (logistic) regression to
three or more hierarchical levels is implemented in function
MVS
(alias mvs
).
Model relaxation (as used in, e.g., the relaxed lasso) can be
applied using argument relax
, which can be either either a
logical vector of length levels
specifying whether model
relaxation should be employed at each level, or a single
TRUE
or FALSE
to enable or disable relaxing
across all levels.
Adaptive weights (as used in, e.g., the adaptive lasso) can be
applied using argument adaptive
, which is either a logical
vector of length levels
specifying whether adaptive weights
should be employed at each level, or a single TRUE or FALSE to enable or
disable adaptive weights across all levels. Note that using adaptive
weights is generally only sensible if alpha > 0 (i.e., if there is at
least some amount of L1 regularization). Adaptive
weights are initialized using ridge regression as described in Van Loon,
Fokkema, Szabo, & De Rooij (2024).
In a two-level StaPLR model, the meta-level regression coefficient of
each view can be used as a measure of that view’s importance. Since, by
default, the view specific predictions are all between 0 and 1, these
regression coefficients are effectively on the same scale. However, in
hierarchical StaPLR/MVS models with more than two levels, it may be hard
to deduce view importance based purely on regression coefficients since
these coefficients may correspond to different sub-models at different
levels of the hierarchy. For hierarchical StaPLR/MVS models the
minority report measure (MRM) (Van Loon et al. (2022)) can be
calculated using MRM()
(alias mrm
). The MRM
quantifies how much the prediction of the complete stacked model changes
as the view-specific prediction of view i changes from
a (default value 0) to b (default value 1), while the
other predictions are kept constant (the recommended value for this
constant being the mean of the outcome variable). For technical details
see Van Loon et al. (2022).
In practice, it is likely that not all views were measured for all observations. Broadly, there are three ways for dealing with this situation:
The first approach is wasteful, and the second one may be very
computationally intensive if there are many features. Assuming the
missing views are missing completely at random, we recommend to impute
missing values at the meta level (Van Loon, Fokkema, De Vos, et al.
(2024)). This is implemented in mvs
through the
na.action
argument. The following options are
available:
fail
causes mvs
to stop whenever it
detects missing values (the default).pass
‘propagates’ the missing values through to the
prediction level, but does not perform imputation.mean
performs meta-level (unconditional) mean
imputation.mice
performs meta-level predictive mean matching. It
requires the R package mice
to be installed.missForest
performs meta-level missForest imputation. It
requires the R package missForest
to be installed.For more information about meta-level imputation see Van Loon, Fokkema, De Vos, et al. (2024).
Van Loon, W., De Vos, F., Fokkema, M., Szabo, B., Koini, M., Schmidt, R., & De Rooij, M. (2022). Analyzing hierarchical multi-view MRI data with StaPLR: An application to Alzheimer’s disease classification. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 830630. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.830630
Van Loon, W., Fokkema, M., De Vos, F., Koini, M., Schmidt, R., & De Rooij, M. (2024). Imputation of missing values in multi-view data. Information Fusion, 111, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102524
Van Loon, W., Fokkema, M., Szabo, B., & De Rooij, M. (2020). Stacked penalized logistic regression for selecting views in multi-view learning. Information Fusion, 61, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.007
Van Loon, W., Fokkema, M., Szabo, B., & De Rooij, M. (2024). View selection in multi-view stacking: Choosing the meta-learner. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11634-024-00587-5