***********************************************************************************

Security Bulletin 9731 DISA Defense Communications System

December 17, 1997 Published by: DISN Security Coordination Center

(SCC@NIC.MIL) 1-(800) 365-3642

DEFENSE INFORMATION SYSTEM NETWORK

SECURITY BULLETIN

The DISN SECURITY BULLETIN is distributed by the DISN SCC (Security Coordination Center) under DISA contract as a means of communicating information on network and host security exposures, fixes, and concerns to security and management personnel at DISN facilities. Back issues may be obtained via FTP from NIC.MIL [207.132.116.5] using login= "anonymous" and password="guest". The bulletin pathname is scc/sec-yynn (where "yy" is the year the bulletin is issued and "nn" is a bulletin number, e.g. scc/sec-9705.txt). These are also available at our WWW site, http://nic.mil.

**************************************************************************

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +

! !

! The following important advisory was issued by the Computer !

! Emergency Response Team (CERT) and is being relayed unedited !

! via the Defense Information Systems Agency's Security !

! Coordination Center distribution system as a means of !

! providing DISN subscribers with useful security information. !

! !

+ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +


===========================================================================

  • CERT* Advisory CA-97.28
  • Original issue date: Dec. 16, 1997
  • Last revised: --
  • Topic: IP Denial-of-Service Attacks

    - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CERT Coordination Center has received reports of two attack tools (Teardrop and Land) that are being used to exploit two vulnerabilities in the TCP/IP protocol. Both tools enable a remote user to cause a denial of service.

    The CERT/CC team recommends installing patches from your vendor. Until you are able to do so, we urge you to use the workaround described in Section III.B. to reduce the likelihood of a successful attack using Land. There is no workaround for Teardrop.

    We will update this advisory as we receive additional information. Please check our advisory files regularly for updates that relate to your site.

    - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I. Description

    In recent weeks there has been discussion on public mailing lists about two denial-of-service attack tools, Teardrop and Land. These attack tools have similar effects on some systems (namely, causing the victim machine to crash), but the tools exploit different vulnerabilities.

    The CERT Coordination Center has received several reports of sites being attacked by either one or both of these tools. It is important to note that it may be necessary for a system administrator to apply separate patches, if they exist, for each attack tool.

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    Some implementations of the TCP/IP IP fragmentation re-assembly code do not properly handle overlapping IP fragments. Teardrop is a widely available attack tool that exploits this vulnerability.

    Topic 2 - Land

    Some implementations of TCP/IP are vulnerable to packets that are crafted in a particular way (a SYN packet in which the source address and port are the same as the destination-i.e., spoofed). Land is a widely available attack tool that exploits this vulnerability.

    II. Impact

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    Any remote user can crash a vulnerable machine.

    Topic 2 - Land

    Any remote user that can send spoofed packets to a host can crash or "hang" that host.

    III. Solution

    CERT/CC urges you to immediately apply vendor patches if they are available. You may have to apply different patches for each attack tool.

    You may want to use the workaround for Land, so please review both Sections A and B below.

    A. Consult your vendor

    Appendix A contains information from vendors who provided input for this advisory. We will update the appendix as we receive more information. If you do not see your vendor's name, the CERT/CC did not hear from that vendor. Please contact your vendor directly.

    It is important to note that you may have to apply different patches for each attack tool.

    B. Apply the following workaround (Land only)

    A workaround for the Land attack tool is to block IP-spoofed packets. This workaround does not apply to the Teardrop attack tool because the Teardrop attack does not rely on IP-spoofed packets.

    Attacks like those of the Land tool rely on the use of forged packets, that is, packets where the attacker deliberately falsifies the origin address. With the current IP protocol technology, it is impossible to eliminate IP-spoofed packets. However, you can reduce the likelihood of your site's networks being used to initiate forged packets by filtering outgoing packets that have a source address different from that of your internal network.

    Currently, the best method to reduce the number of IP-spoofed packets exiting your network is to install filtering on your routers that requires packets leaving your network to have a source address from your internal network. This type of filter prevents a source IP spoofing attack from your site by filtering all outgoing packets that contain a source address from a different network.

    A detailed description of this type of filtering is available in the Internet Draft "Network Ingress Filtering: Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing" by Paul Ferguson of Cisco Systems, Inc. and Daniel Senie of Blazenet, Inc. Note that although this document is labeled as an IETF "working draft," the content is complete and it is being proposed as an Informational RFC. We recommend it to both Internet Service Providers and sites that manage their own routers.

    The document is currently available at

    http://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ferguson-ingress-filtering-03.txt

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Appendix A - Vendor Information

    Below is a list of the vendors who have provided information for this advisory. We will update this appendix as we receive additional information. If you do not see your vendor's name, the CERT/CC did not hear from that vendor. Please contact the vendor directly.

    Cisco Systems

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    No feedback.

    Topic 2 - Land

    IOS/7000 software, Catalyst 5xxx and 29xx LAN switches, BPX and IGX WAN switches and AXIS shelf appear to be vulnerable.

    PIX firewall and Centri firewall are not vulnerable.

    For more information reference URL:

    http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/770/land-pub.shtml

    Digital Equipment Corporation

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    No feedback.

    Topic 2 - Land

    ULTRIX is not vulnerable.

    The FreeBSD Project

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    CSRG 4.4 is not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    No feedback.

    Hewlett-Packard Corporation

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    HP-UX versions 9.04-10.20 are not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    No feedback.

    IBM Corporation

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    AIX is not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    AIX is not vulnerable.

    Microsoft Corporation

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    Windows NT 4.0 with SP 3 and post SP 3 fixes applied and Windows 95 with the appropriate patch are not vulnerable.

    Patch information is available at URL:

    ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/kb/Q154/1/74.TXT

    Topic 2 - Land

    Windows NT 4.0 with the appropriate patch is not vulnerable.

    Patch information is available at URL:

    ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/fixes/usa/nt40/

    hotfixes-postSP3/land-fix/Q165005.txt

    Windows 95 without the WinSock 2.0 Update is not vulnerable.

    Patch information is available at URL:

    ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/bussys/winnt/winnt-public/fixes/usa/nt40/

    hotfixes-postSP3/land-fix/Q177539.TXT

    NCR Corporation

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    NCR TCP/IP implementation is not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    No feedback.

    The NetBSD Project

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    Versions 1.2 and above are not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    No feedback.

    Red Hat Software

    Topic 1 - Teardrop

    Linux is not vulnerable.

    Topic 2 - Land

    Linux is not vulnerable.

    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CERT Coordination Center thanks Paul Ferguson and Daniel Senie for providing information on network ingress filtering.

    - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you believe that your system has been compromised, contact the CERT Coordination Center or your representative in the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (see http://www.first.org/team-info/).

    CERT/CC Contact Information

    - ----------------------------

    Email cert@cert.org

    Phone +1 412-268-7090 (24-hour hotline)

    CERT personnel answer 8:30-5:00 p.m. EST(GMT-5) / EDT(GMT-4)

    and are on call for emergencies during other hours.

    Fax +1 412-268-6989

    Postal address

  • CERT Coordination Center
  • Software Engineering Institute
  • Carnegie Mellon University
  • Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
  • USA
  • Using encryption

    We strongly urge you to encrypt sensitive information sent by email. We can support a shared DES key or PGP. Contact the CERT/CC for more information.

    Location of CERT PGP key

    ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/CERT_PGP.key

    Getting security information

    CERT publications and other security information are available from

  • http://www.cert.org/
  • ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/
  • CERT advisories and bulletins are also posted on the USENET newsgroup

    comp.security.announce

    To be added to our mailing list for advisories and bulletins, send

    email to

    cert-advisory-request@cert.org

    In the subject line, type

    SUBSCRIBE your-email-address

    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Copyright 1997 Carnegie Mellon University. Conditions for use, disclaimers, and sponsorship information can be found in http://www.cert.org/legal_stuff.html and ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/legal_stuff . If you do not have FTP or web access, send mail to cert@cert.org with "copyright" in the subject line.

    *CERT is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

    - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This file: ftp://ftp.cert.org/pub/cert_advisories/CA-97.28.Teardrop_Land

    http://www.cert.org

    click on "CERT Advisories"

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Revision history

    ****************************************************************************

    * *

    * *

    * *

    * *

    * *

    * *

    * *

    * *

    ****************************************************************************

    PLEASE NOTE: Some users outside of the DOD computing communities may receive DISN Security Bulletins. If you are not part of the DOD community, please contact your agency's incident response team to report incidents. Your agency's team will coordinate with DOD. The Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) is a world-wide organization. A list of FIRST member organizations and their constituencies can be obtained by sending email to docserver@first.org with an empty subject line and a message body containing the line: send first-contacts.

    This document was prepared as an service to the DOD community. Neither the United States Government nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.